On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Toerless Eckert wrote:
Me ? No.
Why do we care whether ICANN will delegate .INTERNAL? They'll never
delegate .AA or .ZZ either, and nobody sees that as a problem.
R"s,
John
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 01:22:43PM -0500, John Levine wrote:
It appears that Joe Abley <jab...@strandkip.nl> said:
Hey,
Op 27 feb 2024 om 12:08 heeft Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de> het volgende
geschreven:
I would like to see a BCP RFC on the use of the "internal" TLD,
and ICANN should not finalize availability of the TLD unless that RFC
exists.
Surely what ICANN is preparing to do is make a decision that an "internal" TLD
should never be available. I don't know what there is to be
finalised beyond that decision, or what availability means in that context. Can
you explain?
I am also not sure why an IETF document describing an ICANN decision about the
namespace would help. If you are suggesting that this is not
ICANN's decision to make on its own, then I think you are mistaken.
Sounds like he's confusing .INTERNAL which is for DNS names that are resolved
locally
and the .ALT non-DNS TLD in RFC 9476.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
