Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Representing DNS Messages in JSON (RFC 8427): ugly EDNS

2022-09-15 Thread Ben Schwartz
Regarding a presentation format for OPT, note that the EDNS options have essentially the same wire format as SVCB SvcParams, so it may be possible to share the SvcParams parsing logic. On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:57 AM Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Sep 14, 2022, at 8:54 AM, Petr Špaček wrote: > > I a

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Representing DNS Messages in JSON (RFC 8427): ugly EDNS

2022-09-14 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Sep 14, 2022, at 8:54 AM, Petr Špaček wrote: > I agree that full structured JSON is lots of work, and honestly I don't see > the need for it. > > From my perspective more useful is to standardize unambiguous presentation > formats for all EDNS options first. Maybe we will find out that it is

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Representing DNS Messages in JSON (RFC 8427): ugly EDNS

2022-09-13 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Sep 13, 2022, at 1:33 AM, libor.peltan wrote: > It seems interesting to me, that this RFC is single-authored, Informational > and non-WG. There were plenty of people who helped with useful suggestions and corrections to the drafts. It is Informational because there is no single way to pres