Didn’t we also agree to have Implementation Status in the drafts?
There probably should be such section covering both crypto library support
(OpenSSL is deprecating “engines” in favor of new “providers”).
This would be useful to both help the implementors decide whether it even
makes sense to imp
On 4/14/2022 5:09 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Feb 1, 2022, at 12:35 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
We were reviewing the Working Group Last Call for this, and we received no
comments. We know there was interest in at least moving this forward, but even
Warren concurred we can't send this to the IESG
On Apr 14, 2022, at 17:09, Paul Hoffman wrote:
(Speaking with nohats on)
>
> On Feb 1, 2022, at 12:35 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>> We were reviewing the Working Group Last Call for this, and we received no
>> comments. We know there was interest in at least moving this forward, but
>> even W
On Feb 1, 2022, at 12:35 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> We were reviewing the Working Group Last Call for this, and we received no
> comments. We know there was interest in at least moving this forward, but
> even Warren concurred we can't send this to the IESG unless there are folks
> saying they
