On Apr 14, 2022, at 17:09, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote:
(Speaking with nohats on)
>
> On Feb 1, 2022, at 12:35 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We were reviewing the Working Group Last Call for this, and we received no
>> comments. We know there was interest in at least moving this forward, but
>> even Warren concurred we can't send this to the IESG unless there are folks
>> saying they feel it is ready to be published.
>
> That was a few months ago. There were only two responses, one negative, one
> blandly positive ("seems reasonable").
Not sure if I replied at the time, but I think it should proceed - either as
dnsop or ISE document. There is a requirement, whether we like it or not.
> Can the chairs please say what they expect to do with this draft? I ask
> because it is directly relevant to draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp, where the
> draft's predecessor is mentioned.
I predecessor should be marked dead regardless and not be in the dnssec-bcp
document other than to strongly say not to use it. But that is somewhat
separate from this document.
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
