Re: [DNSOP] software patents Re: draft-fujiwara-dnsop-resolver-update-00

2016-11-14 Thread Ted Lemon
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:13 PM, bert hubert wrote: Bert Huber wrote: > Also, should we work with companies attempting to hinder progress by > clinging to patents which are no longer enforceable? Hm. First, I tend to agree with you that the IETF should not work with companies that attempt to h

Re: [DNSOP] software patents Re: draft-fujiwara-dnsop-resolver-update-00

2016-11-14 Thread bert hubert
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 04:58:43AM +0900, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:13 PM, bert hubert > wrote: > Bert Huber wrote: > > Also, should we work with companies attempting to hinder progress by > > clinging to patents which are no longer enforceable? > > Hm. First, I tend to agr

[DNSOP] software patents Re: draft-fujiwara-dnsop-resolver-update-00

2016-11-11 Thread bert hubert
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:49:31AM +0900, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote: > Jinmei-san, thanks very much for your detailed comments. > > I also received IPR claim from Nominum. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2907/ > https://patents.google.com/patent/US7769826B2/ As a matter of policy, softw