On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message
> ,
> =?UTF-8?Q?Marek_Vavru=C5=A1a?= writes:
>>
>> This affects several major DNS providers currently. I've heard Akamai
>> is rolling out update, but it's still returning NXDOMAIN for ENTs.
>> While deploying the draft in the c
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:46:38PM -0700,
Marek Vavruša wrote
a message of 20 lines which said:
> pointing out various broken implementations is fun,
It is not "fun", it is the only way to have broken implementations
(Akamai, djbdns) fixed. If we do not name them, they will continue
forever.
In message
,
=?UTF-8?Q?Marek_Vavru=C5=A1a?= writes:
>
> This affects several major DNS providers currently. I've heard Akamai
> is rolling out update, but it's still returning NXDOMAIN for ENTs.
> While deploying the draft in the current state of Internet is not
> really viable and pointing out
This affects several major DNS providers currently. I've heard Akamai
is rolling out update, but it's still returning NXDOMAIN for ENTs.
While deploying the draft in the current state of Internet is not
really viable and pointing out various broken implementations is fun,
I think it's good to have
Brian Somers wrote:
> Sorry I’m late to the party, and hopefully I’m misunderstanding, but…. using
> tinydns as an authoritative server:
Hi, Brian:
You might enjoy these threads:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.dnsop/13393
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.dnsext/20301
http:/
On Jun 21, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>
> All
>
> The WGLC last call ended on this awhile ago, and the authors addressed all
> the comments that were raised during the WGLC process.
>
> I want to thank everyone for their work on this. We'll be moving this one
> along very short
All
The WGLC last call ended on this awhile ago, and the authors addressed
all the comments that were raised during the WGLC process.
I want to thank everyone for their work on this. We'll be moving this
one along very shortly.
tim
On 5/26/16 8:53 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
There has been
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> There has been some good discussion from the working group on the list,
> and with the recent discussion on root server tar pitting, it makes sense
> to move this document along.
>
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-
At Thu, 26 May 2016 14:53:06 +0200,
Tim Wicinski wrote:
> There has been some good discussion from the working group on the list,
> and with the recent discussion on root server tar pitting, it makes
> sense to move this document along.
>
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dns
There has been some good discussion from the working group on the list,
and with the recent discussion on root server tar pitting, it makes
sense to move this document along.
This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut
Current versions of the draft is available here
10 matches
Mail list logo
