On Jun 21, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > All > > The WGLC last call ended on this awhile ago, and the authors addressed all > the comments that were raised during the WGLC process. > > I want to thank everyone for their work on this. We'll be moving this one > along very shortly. > > tim > > > On 5/26/16 8:53 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote: >> There has been some good discussion from the working group on the list, >> and with the recent discussion on root server tar pitting, it makes >> sense to move this document along. >> >> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut >> >> Current versions of the draft is available here: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut/ >> >> This is a Standards Track document. >> >> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. Also, if someone >> feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with >> your reasons. >> >> This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends at >> midnight 10 June 2016. >> >> thanks >> tim
Sorry I’m late to the party, and hopefully I’m misunderstanding, but…. using tinydns as an authoritative server: bsomers@dev194:~$ dig dev194.sjc.opendns.com @auth1.opendns.com ; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-3ubuntu0.8-Ubuntu <<>> dev194.sjc.opendns.com @auth1.opendns.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 5740 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 5 ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;dev194.sjc.opendns.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: dev194.sjc.opendns.com. 3600 IN A 67.215.93.64 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: opendns.com. 604800 IN NS auth1.opendns.com. opendns.com. 604800 IN NS auth2.opendns.com. opendns.com. 604800 IN NS auth3.opendns.com. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: auth1.opendns.com. 172800 IN AAAA 2620:119:30::53 auth1.opendns.com. 172800 IN A 208.69.39.2 auth2.opendns.com. 172800 IN AAAA 2a04:e4c0:53::53 auth2.opendns.com. 172800 IN A 146.112.60.53 auth3.opendns.com. 172800 IN A 208.69.39.2 ;; Query time: 9 msec ;; SERVER: 2620:119:30::53#53(2620:119:30::53) ;; WHEN: Tue Jun 21 22:56:28 UTC 2016 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 220 bsomers@dev194:~$ dig sjc.opendns.com @auth1.opendns.com ; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-3ubuntu0.8-Ubuntu <<>> sjc.opendns.com @auth1.opendns.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 53475 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;sjc.opendns.com. IN A ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: opendns.com. 86400 IN SOA auth1.opendns.com. noc.opendns.com. 1466546759 16384 2048 1048576 2560 ;; Query time: 5 msec ;; SERVER: 2620:119:30::53#53(2620:119:30::53) ;; WHEN: Tue Jun 21 22:56:41 UTC 2016 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 79 If we want to say somethings recursively non-existent, don’t we need an RNXDOMAIN rcode? — Brian _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
