Hi,
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There are a few suggestions about the DNS over HTTP draft made off-list,
> which I will try to characterize here:
>
> * We should expand the motivations to explain why DNS over HTTP makes
> sense at all.
>
> * We should restrict
> On 8 Aug 2016, at 14:41, Shane Kerr wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> As for a requirement for TLS... the document currently says that
> implementers SHOULD use TLS. My own feeling is that this should be
> enough; apparently the recommendation to require TLS was made in the
> HTTP/2 working group and rej
Thanks for starting the discussion Shane.
On 8 August 2016 at 23:41, Shane Kerr wrote:
> My own feeling is that this should be
> enough; apparently the recommendation to require TLS was made in the
> HTTP/2 working group and rejected, so I am not sure that we need to
> re-visit the entire discuss
Hello,
There are a few suggestions about the DNS over HTTP draft made off-list,
which I will try to characterize here:
* We should expand the motivations to explain why DNS over HTTP makes
sense at all.
* We should restrict the protocol to TLS.
I am happy to expand the motivation section, al
