At 10:47 -0500 12/20/06, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:31:09AM -0500, Edward Lewis wrote:
Perhaps what needs to be conveyed is that the DNS response to a
reverse map query for an address ought to reflect what is supposed to
be seen at the address.
I like that as a genera
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:31:09AM -0500, Edward Lewis wrote:
> Perhaps what needs to be conveyed is that the DNS response to a
> reverse map query for an address ought to reflect what is supposed to
> be seen at the address.
I like that as a general statement of the point of all of this.
Since
At 15:27 -0500 12/5/06, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
I propose to add the following text to section 4.1 ("Delegation
Recommendations"):
Some IP addresses on the Internet are assigned for special use.
These addresses are described in [RFC3330]. In general, for
addressess that are expected to
Dear Colleagues,
At the late meeting in San Diego, I said when discussing the open
issues list for the reverse-mapping-considerations draft that I had
some language that I'd send to the list for discussion before
updating the document. Here is that text.
Issue 10 is the extent to which this docu
