On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:31:09AM -0500, Edward Lewis wrote: > Perhaps what needs to be conveyed is that the DNS response to a > reverse map query for an address ought to reflect what is supposed to > be seen at the address.
I like that as a general statement of the point of all of this. Since the point is to make this a "considerations" document, surely the general statement is enough? > Perhaps a special comment ought to be made about "leaking" although I I avoided talking about that because I think it's already covered in the Mark Andrews draft about defaults for local zones. I'm happy to put a reference in, but the sense I got in San Diego and previously was that people didn't want that, because the reference might hold up the draft and we've been waiting long enough. A -- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> M2P 2A8 jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 416 646 3304 x4110 _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
