On Sun, 10 Jul 2022, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
Sorry for a very=C2=A0long delay, as your review was the only one I thoug=
ht there was not enough interest in
this document.
It escaped my attention. I have done a review now, and the document
looks okay, but still needs some changes I think.
On 7/10/2022 12:30 PM, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
Section 10: "
Sorry, didn't get :(
I hope this helps -
Mike
Oops. My fault, and I never went back to expand on the omission.
Basically, section 10 has TBA1 and TBA2 for two code points, but you use
actual values for your examples
Dear Michael,
Sorry for a very long delay, as your review was the only one I thought
there was not enough interest in this document.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 12:04 AM Michael StJohns
wrote:
> On 2/1/2022 3:35 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> All
>
> We were reviewing the Working Group Last Call for th
On 2/1/2022 3:35 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
All
We were reviewing the Working Group Last Call for this, and we
received no comments. We know there was interest in at least moving
this forward, but even Warren concurred we can't send this to the IESG
unless there are folks saying they feel it is
All
We were reviewing the Working Group Last Call for this, and we received no
comments. We know there was interest in at least moving this forward, but
even Warren concurred we can't send this to the IESG unless there are folks
saying they feel it is ready to be published.
Thanks
tim
---
