On 7/10/2022 12:30 PM, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
Section 10: "
Sorry, didn't get :(
I hope this helps -
Mike
Oops. My fault, and I never went back to expand on the omission.
Basically, section 10 has TBA1 and TBA2 for two code points, but you use
actual values for your examples. Given that I was pushing for worked
examples, and the worked examples depend on the actual values of those
code points to calculate things like the RRSIG, you may want to ask for
an early assignment of these code points from the IANA. RFC7120 has the
guidelines.
( RFC7120 - 2.d - contention here is mostly that you'd have to do a
revision of the ID examples if someone else was assigned those code
points). The alternative is to do the example update during AUTH48, but
that seems like a lot of unnecessary work for the IANA, RPC and
I'll take a look at the new draft in a day or so. Thanks for addressing
my comments.
Mike
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
