Hi
The Call for Adoption has ended and there was support to adopt this
document and work out the handful of issues brought up. Thanks everyone
for comments, etc.
If the authors can upload a new version we;ll get that one squared away.
thanks
tim/suzanne
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:16 AM, tjw iet
;tjw ietf"
> To: "dnsop"
> Sent: Thursday, 16 March, 2017 08:16:50
> Subject: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption:
> draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations
> All
>
> We've had a lot of WG discussion on this, and it seems relevant to do a formal
> call f
On 3/16/2017 3:16 AM, tjw ietf wrote:
All
We've had a lot of WG discussion on this, and it seems relevant to do
a formal call for adoption. If there are outstanding issues raised
during the CfA, time in Chicago will be set aside to have those
discussions.
This starts a Call for Adoption
On 3/16/2017 10:24 AM, william manning wrote:
this is a useful and needed document. I support its adoption by the
WG. As a note to the authors, there was a proposed alternate to what
became RFC 5011 which addressed some of the same issues as the current
draft. It might be useful to review
ht
william manning writes:
> this is a useful and needed document. I support its adoption by the WG. As a
> note to the authors, there was a proposed alternate to what became RFC 5011
> which addressed some of the same issues as the current draft. It might be
> useful to review
> https://tools.ie
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:16 AM, tjw ietf wrote:
> All
>
> We've had a lot of WG discussion on this, and it seems relevant to do a
> formal call for adoption. If there are outstanding issues raised during
> the CfA, time in Chicago will be set aside to have those discussions.
>
>
> This starts
this is a useful and needed document. I support its adoption by the WG.
As a note to the authors, there was a proposed alternate to what became RFC
5011 which addressed some of the same issues as the current draft. It might
be useful to review
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupd
Tim,
At 2017-03-16 03:16:50 -0400
tjw ietf wrote:
> We've had a lot of WG discussion on this, and it seems relevant to do a
> formal call for adoption. If there are outstanding issues raised during
> the CfA, time in Chicago will be set aside to have those discussions.
>
>
> This starts a Ca
On 16.3.2017 08:16, tjw ietf wrote:
> All
>
> We've had a lot of WG discussion on this, and it seems relevant to do a
> formal call for adoption. If there are outstanding issues raised
> during the CfA, time in Chicago will be set aside to have those
> discussions.
>
>
> This starts a Call fo
All
We've had a lot of WG discussion on this, and it seems relevant to do a
formal call for adoption. If there are outstanding issues raised during
the CfA, time in Chicago will be set aside to have those discussions.
This starts a Call for Adoption for:
draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-consid
10 matches
Mail list logo
