william manning <chinese.apri...@gmail.com> writes: > this is a useful and needed document. I support its adoption by the WG. As a > note to the authors, there was a proposed alternate to what became RFC 5011 > which addressed some of the same issues as the current draft. It might be > useful to review > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-threshold-01 going > forward.
Thanks Bill! And I do remember it (and the discussions at the time). Note that we're not trying to create a document that modifies the procedures at all, just trying to create one that ensures people can securely use the existing one with proper knowledge. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
