On 1/7/2020 10:05 PM, Brian Dickson wrote:
My $0.02 on the size issue:
I think the onus should be on whoever is publishing a zone with a
ZONEMD to provide guidance on what to do if a failure occurs.
Similarly, publishers should be sensible on whether to include a
ZONEMD based on total size and
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 10:06 PM Brian Dickson
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 6:18 PM Paul Hoffman
> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 7, 2020, at 6:03 PM, Joe Abley > > wrote:
>> > I don't object to the intended status (standards track). There are
>> reports of multiple independent implementations include
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 6:18 PM Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2020, at 6:03 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
> > I don't object to the intended status (standards track). There are
> reports of multiple independent implementations included in the document,
> which seems pleasing and proper.
>
> Definitely p
On Jan 7, 2020, at 6:03 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
> I don't object to the intended status (standards track). There are reports of
> multiple independent implementations included in the document, which seems
> pleasing and proper.
Definitely proper. The calls for making this RFC "experimental" go aga
