On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 15:04, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2022, at 2:16 PM, Melinda Shore
> wrote:
> >
> >> I agree that the list of implementations should be deleted or
> summarized in an appendix.
> >
> > Well, maybe. The "Let's Encrypt" example is actually part of the
> > acme spec (RFC
On Jul 12, 2022, at 2:16 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
>
>> I agree that the list of implementations should be deleted or summarized in
>> an appendix.
>
> Well, maybe. The "Let's Encrypt" example is actually part of the
> acme spec (RFC 8555) and is an IETF product.
It is definitely worth keeping
I support adoption of this document as long as the WG version does not list
current implementations by name. As Mike StJohns points out, listing current
methods in a long-lived RFC has significant problems, and it doesn't help the
future reader decide what they want to do. It is still fine to ca
