On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 15:04, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2022, at 2:16 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.sh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> I agree that the list of implementations should be deleted or > summarized in an appendix. > > > > Well, maybe. The "Let's Encrypt" example is actually part of the > > acme spec (RFC 8555) and is an IETF product. > > It is definitely worth keeping the pointer to the ACME spec without naming > Let's Encrypt. That organization might choose to do something different in > the future, and it would confuse a reader who found this RFC if it said > "Let's Encrypt does this" when they don't. > Makes sense, that's what I've done in the latest update (not yet pushed to Datatracker for the usual reasons): https://shivankaul.com/draft-sahib-domain-verification-techniques/draft-sahib-domain-verification-techniques.html#section-3.1-5 > > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
