On 6/18/2021 6:32 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Jun 18, 2021, at 2:21 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
Peter van Dijk writes:
I propose replacing rfc5011-security-considerations
I keep meaning to republish it with Olafur's suggested reduced title
(since it's really describing just one problem). But it
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 8:49 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> Someone mentioned Mark's glue-is-not-optional draft. The chairs really
> liked this document,
> and wanted to keep it alive. We've reached out to
> mark several times with no response, so we requested the XML from the
> secretariat,
> dumpe
This is all great feedback everyone, please don't stop.
I wanted to say we'll talk to Warren on the 5011-considerations document,
but Warren is a co-author, so we'll need to start over.
Someone mentioned Mark's glue-is-not-optional draft. The chairs really
liked this document,
and wanted to keep
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 6:33 PM Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2021, at 2:21 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> >
> > Peter van Dijk writes:
> >
> >> I propose replacing rfc5011-security-considerations
> >
> > I keep meaning to republish it with Olafur's suggested reduced title
> > (since it's really
draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-information (in the expired queue) can probably be
dropped. It was intended for some of the use cases of the ADD WG, but that WG
is now no longer considering the document for its work.
--Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
On Jun 18, 2021, at 2:21 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>
> Peter van Dijk writes:
>
>> I propose replacing rfc5011-security-considerations
>
> I keep meaning to republish it with Olafur's suggested reduced title
> (since it's really describing just one problem). But it's unlikely to
> get published
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021, Paul Hoffman wrote:
With the criteria that Tim set out yesterday, the WG now has 25 accepted drafts
to work on. Even if we move on one draft every month, which is faster than our
pace from the past few years, we will still have a dozen drafts a year from now
(and more if
On Jun 17, 2021, at 7:58 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> While having a discussion with the IESG, I had a look at the number of Active
> Drafts that we have, and compared it to other workinggroups -- DNSOP
> currently has 14 listed, with 3 in some form of publication requested
> (draft-ietf-dnsop-ia
