On Jun 18, 2021, at 2:21 PM, Wes Hardaker <wjh...@hardakers.net> wrote: > > Peter van Dijk <peter.van.d...@powerdns.com> writes: > >> I propose replacing rfc5011-security-considerations > > I keep meaning to republish it with Olafur's suggested reduced title > (since it's really describing just one problem). But it's unlikely to > get published as an RFC due to lack of consensus after a long drawn out > conversation where most of the WG stopped reading due to the harsh > language of some messages.
For those who don't remember, the lack of consensus was based on too few people speaking to support the document after one WG member kept harshly objecting to some of the wording. This happened well WG Last Call was finished. The chairs decided to kill the document rather than deal decisively with the one obstructionist WG participant. > It can probably be dropped from the active > list because of this. I would like to see the document, which we all already agreed on, moved to IETF Last Call instead. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
