Ok, thanks.
Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...
> On Oct 12, 2020, at 6:38 AM, Roy Arends wrote:
>
>
>>> On 12 Oct 2020, at 08:44, Fred Baker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Oct 8, 2020, at 7:08 AM, Daniel Miga
> On Oct 8, 2020, at 7:08 AM, Daniel Migault via RSSAC wrote:
>
> Just to let you know that the draft for the private tld has been adopted as
> WG document.
>
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-private-use-tld-00.txt
>
> Yours,
> Daniel
Thanks, Daniel.
Joe and Roy, I'm trying
Speaking for myself, I see HE as a mechanism whose usefulness as described
(selecting between IPv4 and IPv6 addresses) will wane, but which applied in a
different way may have value long term. The latter has to do with access from
or to multi-addressed services and selecting the one that seems t
> On Sep 24, 2018, at 11:14 AM, 神明達哉 wrote:
>
> At Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:31:50 +0800,
> Davey Song wrote:
>
> > I just submited a new draft intending to provide better connectivity from
> > network side function . Comments are welcome.
>
> Some quick observations:
>
> - I don't see why the in
> On Nov 24, 2017, at 12:47 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> wrote:
>
> I’ve started also to work in a policy proposal for ICANN in order to make
> sure that we get aligned.
One thing you might want to think about: the root servers are all IPv6-capable
today and serve requests using IPv6, and the
On Aug 16, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Aug 16, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
>> In both cases, the addresses are concocted by the system using them. For RFC
>> 4862, that means "when the system receives a new prefix in an RA". My
>> unders
On Aug 15, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2011, at 1:26 AM, Leo Liu(bing) wrote:
>> Thanks for the info, that's quite helpful. So can we assume that
>> Windows-based DNS systems have been widely deployed rfc3007?
>
> This is kind of a bizarre conversation. DDNS use is widesp
