> On Nov 24, 2017, at 12:47 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ > <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es> wrote: > > I’ve started also to work in a policy proposal for ICANN in order to make > sure that we get aligned.
One thing you might want to think about: the root servers are all IPv6-capable today and serve requests using IPv6, and the 1541 TLDs are all required by contract with ICANN to be IPv6-capable. I think you'll find yourself holding the burden of proof that the infrastructure isn't capable of IPv6-only operation today. RSO statistics are available from http://www.root-servers.org/. ICANN TLDs are at https://data.iana.org/TLD/tlds-alpha-by-domain.txt. Reading through your draft, what I see that is probably not present today is an IPv6 address for every SLD, which is to say names like "example.com". What might be worth your while (I copy Daniel because he did a similar study using RIPE Atlas not too long ago and can point you to relevant documentation on how to do one yourself) would be to set up a RIPE Atlas study that accesses the Root, ccTLD, and gTLD authoritative servers using their IPv6 addresses and reports on the status of that from a wide variety of locations.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
