[DNSOP] Multiple QTYPEs hackathon

Hello DNSOP, You may recall that DNSSD adopted https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes/, which defines a way for clients to query for multiple RR types in a single message. If servers don't support this, clients should detect this and handle it well. There are of course man

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-qdcount-is-one

DNSOP, I've reviewed draft-ietf-dnsop-qdcount-is-one-02. I find it generally very clear. It is a little cart-before-horse in having the reasoning occur after the conclusion. But I can see the benefit in having a very clear statement up front in the document. Some people only read the beginning. S

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp-02.txt

Hi everyone Referring back to a little earlier in today's agenda, I've just raised a two-word PR #9 which aims to remove a possible misinterpretation of the BCP text by a less experienced reader. The PR says: The current text can be i

Re: [DNSOP] [dnssd] Adoption call for draft-sekar-dns-ul-03 into DNSSD

Thanks for the comments on the draft. In total we had six people who said they'd read the draft and supported its adoption, two of which noted some changes they'd like considered. There were no people against adoption. I have now formally adopted the draft into DNSSD. Stuart or Ted could you pleas

[DNSOP] Adoption call for draft-sekar-dns-ul-03 into DNSSD

WG members, This email starts a call to adopt https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sekar-dns-ul-03 into the DNSSD working group. What is this? Abstract: This document proposes a new EDNS0 option that can be used by DNS Update clients and DNS servers to include a lease lifetime in a D