Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
> -Original Message-
> From: Brotman, Alex
> Sent: Monday, January 6, 2025 4:46 PM
> To: Mark Andrews
> Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [DNSOP] Flag for Wildcard Responses
>
> These are zones I do not control.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Andrews
> Sent: Monday, January 6, 2025 4:43 PM
> To: Brotman, Alex
> Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Flag for Wildcard Responses
>
> Sign the zone. Wildcard responses are visible in the DNSSEC records. The
> RRSI
Looking at something relating to the day job, and I'm curious if there's any
method declared in the IETF world where the query side of the interaction can
understand that the response was fulfilled by a wildcard record. I've asked a
few folks, and I haven't gotten anything that suggests as thou
John,
If the concern is a string of period-separated gibberish, why not create some
artificial/sane limit where the receivers stop at N steps?
I can't say I'm personally a huge fan of tree-walks, only because I feel like
the responsible party should have the ability to manage their DMARC proper
arch 3, 2020 11:55 PM
To: Brotman, Alex
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org; Stephen Farrell
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DNSOP] RDBD (Related Domains By DNS)
It sounds like you're proposing that this would be used as part of an
anti-phishing e-mail filtering system. That seems like a fine use-case, and
ch 3, 2020 5:38 PM
To: Brotman, Alex
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org; Stephen Farrell
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DNSOP] RDBD (Related Domains By DNS)
Thanks for the draft. I haven't been following this, and I found it
interesting.
I would appreciate more fully worked use cases to explain the motivation.
Hello,
A while ago, Stephen and I had sent out a few versions of this, and we had some
discussions and revisions were made. At the time, discussion waned, however I
wanted to pick this up again before the onset of IETF107.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brotman-rdbd/
I've had some fo
