Hello, A while ago, Stephen and I had sent out a few versions of this, and we had some discussions and revisions were made. At the time, discussion waned, however I wanted to pick this up again before the onset of IETF107.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brotman-rdbd/ I've had some folks contact me privately, and I saw an inquiry on another list. There does seem to be some interest, at least in the anti-abuse and research communities, of making this a functional proposition. To recap, the rough idea is that implementers would be able to positively or negatively confirm relationships between domains. In the world of anti-abuse and research, these links are not always obvious. For example, in a large corporation, some teams may go outside acceptable practice and register a domain through another provider. Or it may be that you have international branches that operate on a different TLD, but you may not have registered with all TLDs. In the latter case, being able to both positively and negatively state a relationship could be useful for anti-spam/phishing. Any questions or comments would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop