e known better
from the outset.
+1 to anything I can wave with when arguing against search
lists. People doesn't seem to believe me when I use
performance arguments against it.
--
Åke Nordin , resident Net/Lunix/telecom geek.
Netia Data AB, Stockholm SWEDEN +46704660199
__
interesting to hear what problems these operators are trying
> to solve by implementing these minimums. 7200 seconds does seem like a
> pretty high value to lower bound TTLs at.
Whoah, extending TTL to 2h becomes pretty bad when the name was nefarious
and taken down within, say, 15 minutes.
Bill Woodcock wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
>
>On Sep 27, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
>> Whether this is a DNSOP WG item rests on how broad the interest is
>
>On Sep 27, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> I for one am interested and willing to w
Bill Woodcock wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
>
>On Sep 27, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
>> Whether this is a DNSOP WG item rests on how broad the interest is
>
>On Sep 27, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> I for one am interested and willing to w
