On Sat, 2 dec 2017, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Fri, 1 Dec 2017, Steve Crocker wrote: > > > Let me make a guess that the only lengthening that takes place in > > practice is a floor of ten seconds. > > > > Comments? > > I might be misinterpreting, but from the data presented in the graph in > section 3.2 it looks like some will increase TTL to 7200 seconds at the > highest. There seems to be large bumps at the 600, 1200 and 1800 second > "minimum TTL" capping (if I guess correctly from looking at that graph). > > It would be interesting to hear what problems these operators are trying > to solve by implementing these minimums. 7200 seconds does seem like a > pretty high value to lower bound TTLs at.
Whoah, extending TTL to 2h becomes pretty bad when the name was nefarious and taken down within, say, 15 minutes. That renders a lot of good people's work less useful. BR, -- Åke Nordin <ake.nor...@netia.se>, resident Net/Lunix/telecom geek.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
