Hello DNSOP,
You may recall that DNSSD adopted
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes/, which
defines a way for clients to query for multiple RR types in a single
message. If servers don't support this, clients should detect this and
handle it well. There are of course man
Reviewer: Magnus Nyström
Review result: Has Issues
1. Section 2 states "Domain Security Algorithm Numbers" as a new registry.
However, the text only refers to a "DNS System Algorithm Numbers" registry. Are
these intended to be the same? 2. Section 2 states "Adding a new entry to the
"DNS System Al
On 10/03/2025 19:59, Victor Zhou wrote:
Would there be interest in such an informational document?
Have you read RFC 5507 ?
It doesn't consider transition mechansisms but in this context it's
worth reading.
Ray
___
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ie
Peter,
Thank you again for your reply and happy to clear my DISCUSS as the blocking
issues are solved in the -08.
About the “should” for sure your example is a good one where explaining the
“bypass consequences” is useless.
Regards
-éric
From: Peter Thomassen
Date: Tuesday, 11 March 2025 at
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-08: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
h
