It appears that Suzanne Woolf said:
>If you feel the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with
>your reasons.
The bits on the wire are fine, but I am unhappy with the implication that
reasonable people should be happy with fake NODATA but if you're a pedant who
demands NXDO
I have read the most recent version of the document and am strongly in
favor of its publication as a proposed standard. I want my NXDOMAINs
back.
I have little substantive feedback on the text, mostly personal
editorial preferences that are not worth fussing about.
That said, is "lexicographic s
I do not think this conflict of views can be resolved. The draft is intended to
show how it ECH should be used to preserve it’s security guarantees, and there
are groups in the DNS community who say this prevents their normal course of
operation, and providing the features that they provide. I
Hi Ben, thank you for your answer but this is confirming I have a lot of
difficulties to agree. In fact I disagree and after thorough internal
discussions this confirms the solidity of our support to Paul Vixie’s position.
Re-read Paul V. answers and consider the MUST NOT clauses in his emails
