I have read the most recent version of the document and am strongly in favor of its publication as a proposed standard. I want my NXDOMAINs back.
I have little substantive feedback on the text, mostly personal editorial preferences that are not worth fussing about. That said, is "lexicographic successor" defined anywhere handy? Though I know what it is, perhaps it'd be helpful for implementers to have a reference to ... 4471 section 3.1.2? Also, I'm feeling stupid, but how does this preclude RFC 8020 as said in the Operational Considerations section? Are you saying it precludes signed NXDOMAINs from cache? Because if I, a resolver, ask about bigfoot.example.com and get told "bigfoot doesn't exist, and here's the NXNAME to prove it", why can't I then let non-DNSSEC clients know that sonof.bigfoot.example.com also doesn't exist without asking example.com again? Maybe that sentence needs either a qualification, or an explanation for folks like me. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
