On 19Jan24, Dave Lawrence apparently wrote:
> Mark Andrews writes:
> > It’s a couple of lines of code in a nameserver to support QCOUNT=0.
> > It will take more time debating this than it took to implement
> > support for QCOUNT=0.
>
> Miek Gieben writes:
> > yes, please, the amount of code that d
The Domain Name System Operations (dnsop) WG will hold a virtual interim
meeting on 2024-01-30 from 18:00 to 19:00 Europe/Amsterdam (17:00 to 18:00
UTC).
Agenda:
# DNS Operations (DNSOP) Working Group
## interim-2024-dnsop-01
### Chairs
* Benno Overeinder [be...@nlnetlabs.nl](be...@nlnetlabs.nl
Mark Andrews writes:
> It’s a couple of lines of code in a nameserver to support QCOUNT=0.
> It will take more time debating this than it took to implement
> support for QCOUNT=0.
Miek Gieben writes:
> yes, please, the amount of code that duplicates checks for
> QDCOUNT!=1 is staggering, and that
Thanks Peter and Paul
I'll review the revised I-D but we were thinking of going another (perhaps
shorter) follow up working group last call
tim
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 8:59 AM Peter Thomassen wrote:
> For the record, Paul and I sorted these out off-list (for real, this
> time!), and I'll push
Dear WP,
This is the update resulting from WGLC comments. Changes:
- Editorial changes to Security Considerations
- Add/discuss bootstrapping triggers via notifications
- (non-WGLC) Add Glauca registrar implementation
Best,
Peter
On 1/19/24 14:56, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Internet-Dra
For the record, Paul and I sorted these out off-list (for real, this time!),
and I'll push a new revision of the draft shortly.
~Peter
On 11/20/23 16:49, Peter Thomassen wrote:
Hi Paul, (off-list)
To keep the ball rolling, may I nudge you for your opinion on the below? :)
Thank you very muc
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping-07.txt is now available.
It is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF.
Title: Automatic DNSSEC Bootstrapping using Authenticated Signals from the
Zone's Operator
Authors: Peter Thomassen
Nils
i think offering more than one wire encoding to get the same outcome
would be the opposite of simplicity. if the ietf were to decide that
dnssec had been a mistake and universal deployment was no longer to be
sought, then we would want to look carefully at the features it had
contained and cons
[ Quoting in "Re: [DNSOP] Dnsdir early review of ..." ]
I wholeheartedly support the draft.
The only piece missing to make it *perfect* is "MUST use QDCOUNT=1",
or in other words, banning QDCOUNT=0 usage with DNS COOKIES. It's
unnecessary complexity.
yes, please, the amount of code that dupli
