[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-automation-02.txt

2023-10-22 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-automation-02.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF. Title: DNSSEC automation Authors: Ulrich Wisser Shumon Huque Johan Stenstam Name:draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Warren did a bad (was Re: Datatracker State Update Notice: )

2023-10-22 Thread Paul Wouters
> On Oct 22, 2023, at 15:56, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > On Oct 22, 2023, at 10:28, Paul Wouters wrote: >> >> I thought we all agreed the IESG would mark the old GOST RFCs Historic and >> then the new RFCs don’t have to obsolete anything ? > > > Define "we all". I don't think that decision was

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Warren did a bad (was Re: Datatracker State Update Notice: )

2023-10-22 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Oct 22, 2023, at 10:28, Paul Wouters wrote: > > I thought we all agreed the IESG would mark the old GOST RFCs Historic and > then the new RFCs don’t have to obsolete anything ? Define "we all". I don't think that decision was made (nor even announced) in the DNSOP WG where the documents or

[DNSOP] DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines (draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-00)

2023-10-22 Thread Momoka Yamamoto
Hello DNSOP Working Group, My name is Momoka Yamamoto and I've recently submitted an Internet-Draft titled "DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines" (draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-00) with my co-author Tobias tfie...@mpi-inf.mpg.de. This draft discusses the operational guidelines for operating auth

Re: [DNSOP] Warren did a bad (was Re: Datatracker State Update Notice: )

2023-10-22 Thread Paul Wouters
I thought we all agreed the IESG would mark the old GOST RFCs Historic and then the new RFCs don’t have to obsolete anything ?PaulSent using a virtual keyboard on a phoneOn Oct 22, 2023, at 13:24, Boris Makarenko wrote: Eliot and Warren, As I remember, the idea was to

Re: [DNSOP] Warren did a bad (was Re: Datatracker State Update Notice: )

2023-10-22 Thread Boris Makarenko
Eliot and Warren, As I remember, the idea was to split original draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis to two different RFCs - one in the ISE stream which should describe the operations for use GOST-2012 algorithms in DNSSEC, and other in the IETF stream which should obsolete RFC 5933 and update RFC 86

Re: [DNSOP] Warren did a bad (was Re: Datatracker State Update Notice: )

2023-10-22 Thread Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)
A quick status from the ISE: draft-makarenko-gost2012-dnssec was formally submitted to me for consideration as an independent RFC in May of this year.  Before I make a publication decision, there are a number of issues that need to be addressed: * What to do about RFC 5933?  The original dr

[DNSOP] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-15

2023-10-22 Thread Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
Reviewer: Mirja Kühlewind Review result: Ready with Issues This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors and W