Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-automation-02.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF.
Title: DNSSEC automation
Authors: Ulrich Wisser
Shumon Huque
Johan Stenstam
Name:draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-
> On Oct 22, 2023, at 15:56, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
> On Oct 22, 2023, at 10:28, Paul Wouters wrote:
>>
>> I thought we all agreed the IESG would mark the old GOST RFCs Historic and
>> then the new RFCs don’t have to obsolete anything ?
>
>
> Define "we all". I don't think that decision was
On Oct 22, 2023, at 10:28, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> I thought we all agreed the IESG would mark the old GOST RFCs Historic and
> then the new RFCs don’t have to obsolete anything ?
Define "we all". I don't think that decision was made (nor even announced) in
the DNSOP WG where the documents or
Hello DNSOP Working Group,
My name is Momoka Yamamoto and I've recently submitted an Internet-Draft
titled "DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines"
(draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-00) with my co-author Tobias
tfie...@mpi-inf.mpg.de. This draft discusses the operational guidelines for
operating auth
I thought we all agreed the IESG would mark the old GOST RFCs Historic and then the new RFCs don’t have to obsolete anything ?PaulSent using a virtual keyboard on a phoneOn Oct 22, 2023, at 13:24, Boris Makarenko wrote:
Eliot and Warren,
As I remember, the idea was to
Eliot and Warren,
As I remember, the idea was to split original
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis to two different RFCs - one in the ISE
stream which should describe the operations for use GOST-2012 algorithms
in DNSSEC, and other in the IETF stream which should obsolete RFC 5933
and update RFC 86
A quick status from the ISE:
draft-makarenko-gost2012-dnssec was formally submitted to me for
consideration as an independent RFC in May of this year. Before I make
a publication decision, there are a number of issues that need to be
addressed:
* What to do about RFC 5933? The original dr
Reviewer: Mirja Kühlewind
Review result: Ready with Issues
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and W