On Sep 7, 2023, at 19:28, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>
>
> The server shouldn’t be caching the RRset and it’s RRSIGs unless they validate
> successfully. This is a requirement of DNSSEC. This is also why recursive
> servers need to validate responses so that garbage is not cached.
Ah, so just th
Internet-Draft draft-bash-rfc7958bis-01.txt is now available. It is a work
item of the Domain Name System Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF.
Title: DNSSEC Trust Anchor Publication for the Root Zone
Authors: Joe Abley
Jakob Schlyter
Guillaume Bailey
Paul
> On 7 Sep 2023, at 13:56, Paul Wouters via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-07: Yes
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To
Hi David,
First of all, thanks for the review!
The changes made in response to it (plus a few minor editorial changes I found
useful) are recorded here:
https://github.com/peterthomassen/draft-ietf-dnsop-cds-consistency/pull/4
I'd appreciate if you can let me know if you agree with them, so I
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-07: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please re
Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, howe
