Re: [DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-06

2023-08-21 Thread Lucas Pardue
Hi Wesley, Thanks for the response, see mine in-line. On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:07 PM Wessels, Duane wrote: > > > > On Aug 11, 2023, at 5:36 AM, Lucas Pardue via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not > click links

Re: [DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-06

2023-08-21 Thread Joe Abley
On 21 Aug 2023, at 17:08, Wessels, Duane wrote: > You’re right that we have not been especially precise when using the word > “transport.” > The authors did intend for DNS over UDP, over TCP, and over TLS, etc to > essentially > be treated as separate transports, or separate ways a client can

Re: [DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-06

2023-08-21 Thread Wessels, Duane
> On Aug 11, 2023, at 5:36 AM, Lucas Pardue via Datatracker > wrote: > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > Reviewer: Lucas Pardue > Review result: Ready

[DNSOP] AD Review of: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis

2023-08-21 Thread Warren Kumari
1: Please add to the Abstract saying what this changes in RFC2308, and how it obsoletes RFC8499. E.g: "This document updates RFC 2308 by clarifying the definitions of Forwarder and QNAME, and obsoletes RFC 8499 by adding multiple terms and additional clarifications. A comprehensive list can be fond