On 21 Aug 2023, at 17:08, Wessels, Duane <dwessels=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> You’re right that we have not been especially precise when using the word > “transport.” > The authors did intend for DNS over UDP, over TCP, and over TLS, etc to > essentially > be treated as separate transports, or separate ways a client can talk to a > server. > > I’m not sure how best to fix this. On one hand, as far as we know, there is > currently not a good term that collectively refers to DNS over UDP, TCP, TLS, > HTTPS, > QUIC, and whatever else may come our way. So maybe we need to define one. > I’m > hesitant, though, because I’m not sure this document is where such a term > should > be introduced, and because definitions often turn out to be like cans of > worms. Documents like this one are surely where definitions first arise, to be collated and argued about later during the next terminology draft rev. > Nonetheless, we have taken a stab at it: I think your stab is a good stab. I like it. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
