John Levine wrote on 2023-07-19 14:43:
It appears that Paul Wouters said:
On Jul 17, 2023, at 22:50, Paul Vixie wrote:
... RFC 4408 was folly. ...
The IETF did make a mistake there for sure.
I wouldn't disagree, but you can barely see the spots in the dirt
where the barn was before th
It appears that Paul Wouters said:
>On Jul 17, 2023, at 22:50, Paul Vixie
>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Agreed, but that horse had already left the barn when we published the
>>> first SPF RFC 4408.
>> RFC 4408 was folly. TXT in a subdomain (RFC 5507 s3.2) would suit domain
>> verification well (w
On Jul 19, 2023, at 01:54, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>
>
> George Michaelson wrote on 2023-07-18 22:41:
>> ...
>> my concerns with the PSL governance aren't relevant either. I am sure
>> it was purposeful. I don't have to like things for them to provide
>> upsides.
>
> when we've tried to talk abou
Why is this discussion here and not on the PSL mailing list
(https://groups.google.com/g/publicsuffix-discuss)? Having it there would
greatly increase the chance that the discussion would actually help the PSL.
--Paul Hoffman
___
DNSOP mailing list
DN
On 7/19/23 02:42, George Michaelson wrote:
So, given it exists, systems
are coded to behave against it, and not having SOME ccTLD (and I would
posit gTLD) on it, means they don't match as "first class citizens"
the behaviour the PSL brings.
Actually, the PSL matching algorithm is such that al
What you also missed (in the original post (not quoted any longer)) is
that there is a distinction between the ISO "list" and the list of
delegations.
I agree that there should be a delegation corresponding to EVERY 2
Letter Code Element but that is not the case (and I don't see that
changing soon
Joe, it's clear I didn't understand and I've been hit with quite enough
cluesticks for today.
I missed the wildcards in my parse and having accounted for them I now see
reality as it is.
George
On Wed, 19 July 2023, 19:26 Joe Abley, wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 02:42, George Michaelson >
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 11:26, Joe Abley <[jab...@strandkip.nl](mailto:On Wed,
Jul 19, 2023 at 11:26, Joe Abley < wrote:
> Not all TLDs have the same kind of policy boundary (if they did, arguably we
> would
not
> need the PSL).
Whoops.
Joe___
DNSO
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 02:42, George Michaelson <[g...@algebras.org](mailto:On
Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 02:42, George Michaelson < wrote:
> I know, I could submit these to the PSL website directly.
I think anybody can submit anything they want, but the PSL volunteers have
quite a strict set of int
