What you also missed (in the original post (not quoted any longer)) is that there is a distinction between the ISO "list" and the list of delegations.
I agree that there should be a delegation corresponding to EVERY 2 Letter Code Element but that is not the case (and I don't see that changing soon). And while I also agree that all delegated TLDs (g and cc) should be in the PSL (with their internal policy organization, if relevant), ICANN has nothing to do with the PSL and will not play any role here. greetings, el On 19/07/2023 11:50, George Michaelson wrote: > Joe, it's clear I didn't understand and I've been hit with quite enough > cluesticks for today. > > I missed the wildcards in my parse and having accounted for them I now > see reality as it is. > > George [...] -- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist e...@lisse.na / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 Bachbrecht \ / If this email is signed with GPG/PGP 10007, Namibia ;____/ Sect 20 of Act No. 4 of 2019 may apply _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
