Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for "DNS Terminology" (draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis)

2023-03-10 Thread Benno Overeinder
Dear WG, authors, Summarising the feedback on the mailing list and follow-up steps for the authors. The feedback of Sara has been incorporated in draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-06. The feedback of Peter consists of two items: 1) clarification zone origin to parent zone origin (in the section

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld next steps

2023-03-10 Thread Andrew McConachie
On 7 Mar 2023, at 18:48, Joe Abley wrote: On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 15:56, David Conrad wrote: 4 weeks for ICANN (which? Organization, Board, Community, all 3?) to provide feedback? (That feels sort of like the ITU asking "the IETF" for feedback on an IP-related protocol document in 4 weeks.

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-06.txt

2023-03-10 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF. Title : DNS Terminology Authors : Paul Hoffman Kazunori Fujiwara Filenam

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for "DNS Terminology" (draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis)

2023-03-10 Thread Benno Overeinder
Dear WG, Thank you for your feedback, also from Peter Thomassen in another email thread about the glue definition. Herewith I close the WGLC. Best, -- Benno On 20/02/2023 15:37, Sara Dickinson wrote: Hi, LGTM. I’ve opened a small PR to just update the DoQ references now there is an RFC

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP rfc8499bis Interim followup consensus on historical definition of bailiwick

2023-03-10 Thread Benno Overeinder
Hi Peter, On 06/03/2023 23:31, Peter Thomassen wrote: I just went over the updated wording in draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-05, and the paragraph https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-05.html#section-7-2.36 caught my attention. It uses the term "zone origin", but doesn't