Dear WG, authors,
Summarising the feedback on the mailing list and follow-up steps for the
authors.
The feedback of Sara has been incorporated in
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-06.
The feedback of Peter consists of two items:
1) clarification zone origin to parent zone origin (in the section
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-05.html#section-7-2.36)
2) definition of degree of kinship in context of the term "unrelated
name server".
Feedback 1) can be easily incorporated in the document.
For feedback 2), the chairs agree that the term "unrelated" is a
general/everyday language word and not very specific. We tried to come
up with a better, more specific word, also with help from others, but we
and the WG could not come up with a better term.
While the degree of kinship is more specific and helps us define the
term "unrelated", we feel it adds some complexity to the glue definition
and is otherwise not used/relevant in the document. Therefore, we
suggest that the authors stick to the use of the term "unrelated name
server".
See for context the following email thread,
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PBr7-ZMVYiqEzFalOFAQaMnPpFs/.
The document is now in WG consensus and waiting for write up state.
Best regards,
-- Benno
On 10/03/2023 18:21, Benno Overeinder wrote:
Dear WG,
Thank you for your feedback, also from Peter Thomassen in another email
thread about the glue definition.
Herewith I close the WGLC.
Best,
-- Benno
On 20/02/2023 15:37, Sara Dickinson wrote:
Hi,
LGTM.
I’ve opened a small PR to just update the DoQ references now there is
an RFC:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis/pull/12
Regards
Sara.
On 17 Feb 2023, at 15:51, Benno Overeinder <be...@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
Dear DNSOP WG,
Following the latest consultation with the Working Group on bailiwick
and in-domain/sibling name servers terminology, the authors and
chairs believe this document has reached the stage of being ready for
Working Group Last Call.
Due to normative reference to draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional
(because that draft explains what to do with the definitions in this
draft), both drafts will go to WGLC together. (WGLC for
glue-is-not-optional will be issued early next week.)
This starts a Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis.
Current versions of the draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis/.
The Current Intended Status of this document is: Best Current Practice.
Please review the draft and offer relevant comments.
If this does not seem appropriate please speak out.
If someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please
speak out with your reasons.
Supporting statements that the document is ready are also welcome.
This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on:
March 3rd 2023
Thanks,
-- Benno
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
