Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP rfc8499bis Interim followup consensus on glue definition

Joe Abley wrote on 2022-11-07 13:38: ... I continue to think the necessary/useful debate is a silly one. In the context of a referral response, glue means additional-section records that the sender of the referral imagines might possibly be helpful to the receiver (which in turn means it m

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP rfc8499bis Interim followup consensus on glue definition

On Nov 7, 2022, at 16:28, Kazunori Fujiwara wrote: > "in-domain" glue is necessary. There are cases where that is not true. > "sibling" glue is not necessary. There are cases where that is not true too, including the example you gave after that in that same e-mail: > However, ".com" name res

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP rfc8499bis Interim followup consensus on glue definition

> From: Benno Overeinder > Questions: > > 2. Definition of Glue provided by Duane Wessels on the DNSOP WG > mailing >list: > >"Glue is non-authoritative data in a zone that is transmitted in the >additional section of a referral response on the basis that the data >might be neces

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] An Orderly Way Forward on Special Use Names (Yes, again)

Sounds good. I will hopefully have read the doc by then. Just-in-time delivery, or something. :) Op ma 7 nov. 2022 om 15:40 schreef Paul Hoffman > On Nov 7, 2022, at 12:24 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > > > > I haven't seen an announcement about this side meeting yet. Did I miss > it? > > I sent a shor

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] An Orderly Way Forward on Special Use Names (Yes, again)

On Nov 7, 2022, at 12:24 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > > I haven't seen an announcement about this side meeting yet. Did I miss it? I sent a short notice to DNSOP about 10 days ago: As a followup, because the side-meeting is on

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] An Orderly Way Forward on Special Use Names (Yes, again)

Hi Ted, I think that it is this one (from the side meeting wiki): Wednesday 9 November Room: Richmond 6 - Wednesday 10:00 6761bis Paul Hoffman (paul.hoff...@icann.org) Discussion of the future of RFC 6761 registry; for exa

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] An Orderly Way Forward on Special Use Names (Yes, again)

I haven't seen an announcement about this side meeting yet. Did I miss it? On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 2:21 PM Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: > Replying here only because it is a convenient place in this thread, and > definitely not with any hats on. > > I think that a side meeting specifically to disc

[DNSOP] Minute-taker Re: DNSOP at IETF 115: meeting details, scribe needed, etc.

And of course we need a minute-taker! Please let the chairs know if you’re available to do this. Suzanne On 11/7/22, 7:07 AM, "Suzanne Woolf" mailto:swo...@pir.org>> wrote: Hi all, DNSOP at IETF 115 will be meeting in the first slot on Tuesday, Nov. 7, at 9:30-11:30 local time. Location on

[DNSOP] DNSOP at IETF 115: meeting details, scribe needed, etc.

Hi all, DNSOP at IETF 115 will be meeting in the first slot on Tuesday, Nov. 7, at 9:30-11:30 local time. Location on-site is Kensington I, West Wing, Third Floor. The IETF agenda at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/115/agenda includes links to the WG meeting agenda and other materials, fl