[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp-01.txt

2022-04-14 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) Author : Paul Hoffman Filename: draft-ietf-dn

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis

2022-04-14 Thread Michael StJohns
On 4/14/2022 5:09 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: On Feb 1, 2022, at 12:35 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: We were reviewing the Working Group Last Call for this, and we received no comments. We know there was interest in at least moving this forward, but even Warren concurred we can't send this to the IESG

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis

2022-04-14 Thread Paul Wouters
On Apr 14, 2022, at 17:09, Paul Hoffman wrote: (Speaking with nohats on) > > On Feb 1, 2022, at 12:35 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: >> We were reviewing the Working Group Last Call for this, and we received no >> comments. We know there was interest in at least moving this forward, but >> even W

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Fwd: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis

2022-04-14 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Feb 1, 2022, at 12:35 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > We were reviewing the Working Group Last Call for this, and we received no > comments. We know there was interest in at least moving this forward, but > even Warren concurred we can't send this to the IESG unless there are folks > saying they

[DNSOP] List conduct (was: Re: DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice)

2022-04-14 Thread Suzanne Woolf
Colleagues, As some of you have noted, the thread under the subject “DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice” has included some inappropriate posts, not consistent with the IETF Code of Conduct or guidance on keeping the WG mailing list professional and productive. A DNSOP mailing list participant h

Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

2022-04-14 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 08:55:34PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote: > Paul Wouters wrote: > > > > I can't see any reason why you think the root zone is > > > more secure than TLDs, especially because, as I wrote: > > > > Because I am informed about their operational procedures and I > > contributed to

Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

2022-04-14 Thread Tim Wicinski
I sent this earlier today but I failed to do the Reply-All: --- >From the chairs, This needs to stop. Please send suggested text for the document that can be discussed, otherwise we are requesting you cease Thanks Tim On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:02 AM Paul Wouters wrote: > On Thu, 14

Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

2022-04-14 Thread Paul Wouters
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Masataka Ohta wrote: I can't see any reason why you think the root zone is more secure than TLDs, especially because, as I wrote: Because I am informed about their operational procedures and I contributed to the technical design as one of the for the DNS Root Zone Key

Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

2022-04-14 Thread james
Surely this is at the point of just being trolling right? -Original Message- From: DNSOP On Behalf Of Masataka Ohta Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2022 12:56 PM To: Paul Wouters Cc: dnsop@ietf.org WG Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice Paul Wouters wrote: >> I can't see

Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC as a Best Current Practice

2022-04-14 Thread Masataka Ohta
Paul Wouters wrote: I can't see any reason why you think the root zone is more secure than TLDs, especially because, as I wrote: Because I am informed about their operational procedures and I contributed to the technical design as one of the for the DNS Root Zone Key-Signing-Key of the Root Zo