Hi Vladimir,
Thanks for the feedback. Please see my responses inline.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 1:45 PM Vladimír Čunát
wrote:
> On 15/09/2021 16.41, Daniel Migault wrote:
> > Outside experimentation, especially for national algorithms, this will
> > lead to nations having their algorithms qualif
Hi,
As Paul H. mentioned to me the document is in the last call, I am providing
my comments to the last call mailing list. I feel that my comments mostly
concern the security consideration sections.
Yours,
Daniel
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:41 AM Daniel Migault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I apologize for
On 15/09/2021 16.41, Daniel Migault wrote:
Outside experimentation, especially for national algorithms, this will
lead to nations having their algorithms qualified as standard while
other nations having their algorithms qualified as non standard. I
would like to understand why this cannot be a
Hi,
I apologize for the late answer, but here are my comments regarding the
draft.
I believe the security considerations section needs to mention the
interoperability issue if a hash algorithm is not widely supported by the
resolvers. This, in my view, can potentially affect the DNS system, and I
