Hi, As Paul H. mentioned to me the document is in the last call, I am providing my comments to the last call mailing list. I feel that my comments mostly concern the security consideration sections.
Yours, Daniel On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:41 AM Daniel Migault <mglt.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I apologize for the late answer, but here are my comments regarding the > draft. > > I believe the security considerations section needs to mention the > interoperability issue if a hash algorithm is not widely supported by the > resolvers. This, in my view, can potentially affect the DNS system, and I > believe some text should try to limit non standard algorithms to very > specific deployment - including experimentation. > I believe that for experimentation the draft is helpful. Outside > experimentation, especially for national algorithms, this will lead to > nations having their algorithms qualified as standard while other nations > having their algorithms qualified as non standard. I would like to > understand why this cannot be a problem. For additional transparency, > the document needs, in my opinion, additional clarifications. This > includes guidelines or criteria for algorithms to qualify as standard as > well as the relation with rfc8624 that makes DNSSEC interoperable in terms > of cryptography. More specifically it should clarify that standard > algorithms may or may not be recommended as well as whether non standard > algorithms may or may not be recommended. > > Yours, > Daniel > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 3:07 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> All >> >> The Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons ended >> last week, and we've filtered through the comments both pro and con. >> >> We feel there is rough consensus to move this forward. >> >> thanks >> >> Benno/Suzanne/Tim >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 11:29 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> All >>> >>> This starts a Working Group Last Call for >>> draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons >>> >>> Current versions of the draft is available here: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons/ >>> >>> The Current Intended Status of this document is: Standards Track >>> >>> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. >>> If this does not seem appropriate please speak out. >>> If someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please >>> speak out with your reasons. >>> >>> This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on: 18 >>> August 2021 >>> >>> thanks >>> tim >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> > > > -- > Daniel Migault > Ericsson > -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
