Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-04.txt

Hi folks, On 3/22/21 5:29 PM, Willem Toorop wrote: > [...] > Would be good to have that in a test vector ;). Hence the inclusion of the unsorted keys vector :). > Excellent! How SHOULD it enforce? By failing to load or by fixing. This is all implementation specific of course :). For PowerDNS we

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-04.txt

Op 22-03-2021 om 15:50 schreef Ben Schwartz: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 5:41 AM Willem Toorop > wrote: > > But what about the keys in the "mandatory" SvcParam? Should they be > sorted automatically? Or should the parser produce an error if they are > not sor

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-04.txt

> On 22 Mar 2021, at 20:41, Willem Toorop wrote: > > Op 19-03-2021 om 18:03 schreef Pieter Lexis: >> Hi Willem, >> >> On 3/19/21 11:47 AM, Willem Toorop wrote: >>> That'd be nice! >> >> PR is here [1]. >> >>> Do you also have tests for peculiar/corner and failure cases? >> >> I'm a little b

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-04.txt

Op 19-03-2021 om 18:03 schreef Pieter Lexis: > Hi Willem, > > On 3/19/21 11:47 AM, Willem Toorop wrote: >> That'd be nice! > > PR is here [1]. > >> Do you also have tests for peculiar/corner and failure cases? > > I'm a little bit unsure what you men with this :). Well, I am wondering how much