OARC 34 will be an online meeting on February 4th & 5th starting at
16:00 UTC. The Programme Committee is seeking contributions from the
community.
The deadline for submissions has been extended to the 11th of January
All DNS-related subjects and suggestions for discussion topics are
welcome. Bas
Without going into the original discussion (whether or not to reserve some
sub-range of code points for some purpose or another), I'd like to suggest
a method to use that conserves values better.
This would apply to any very limited resource (such as code points) within
a linear range.
It would bas
On Jan 4, 2021, at 8:33 AM, Jim Reid wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 4 Jan 2021, at 16:18, Paul Wouters wrote:
>>
>> You want to see a Status column at the IANA registry for marking
>> something "NOT RECOMMENDED" / "DEPRECATED" etc ?
>
> Yes!
If the WG adopts the draft, it sounds like the WG might want
> On 4 Jan 2021, at 16:18, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> You want to see a Status column at the IANA registry for marking
> something "NOT RECOMMENDED" / "DEPRECATED" etc ?
Yes!
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/
Hiya,
On 04/01/2021 16:05, Paul Wouters wrote:
While asking is fair, you would also have to define what you
do based on the outcome of that ask. You left that out,
I don't think I did omit that. My stated reason to ask was
to help me figure out what I think about the draft named in
the subje
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, Jim Reid wrote:
Maybe there needs to be another I-D to document the process for adding and
deprecating DNSSEC type codes?
You mean something in addition to RFC 8624 ?
You want to see a Status column at the IANA registry for marking
something "NOT RECOMMENDED" / "DEPRECATE
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, Stephen Farrell wrote:
WRT GOST, we're not really talking about an algorithm but
rather a national crypto standards scheme that selects sets
of algorithms. For such things, whether from Russia or the
US or anywhere, I think it's quite fair to ask "how has
version N dep
> On 4 Jan 2021, at 15:27, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2021 14:23, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>> WRT GOST, we're not really talking about an algorithm but
>>> rather a national crypto standards scheme that selects sets
>>> of algorithms. For such
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 04:21:10AM -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:31 AM Vittorio Bertola 40open-xchange@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > ...
>
> This seems to conflate standardization with code point assignment.
> Standards are recommendations and our recommendation is that
Hiya,
On 04/01/2021 14:23, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, Stephen Farrell wrote:
WRT GOST, we're not really talking about an algorithm but
rather a national crypto standards scheme that selects sets
of algorithms. For such things, whether from Russia or the
US or anywhere, I think it
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, Stephen Farrell wrote:
WRT GOST, we're not really talking about an algorithm but
rather a national crypto standards scheme that selects sets
of algorithms. For such things, whether from Russia or the
US or anywhere, I think it's quite fair to ask "how has
version N deployment
Hiya,
On 04/01/2021 11:31, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
We could ask the proponents of new algorithms for information on
current or expected usage.
WRT GOST, we're not really talking about an algorithm but
rather a national crypto standards scheme that selects sets
of algorithms. For such things,
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:31 AM Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>
>
> > Il 01/01/2021 19:42 Stephen Farrell ha
> scritto:
> >
> >
> > Hiya,
> >
> > On 01/01/2021 17:58, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > > The WG has already adopted the revised GOST document as a WG item;
> > > what you are proposing (if the curren
> Il 01/01/2021 19:42 Stephen Farrell ha scritto:
>
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 01/01/2021 17:58, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > The WG has already adopted the revised GOST document as a WG item;
> > what you are proposing (if the current use is negligible) would be in
> > the opposite direction.
> I wasn't
14 matches
Mail list logo
