On 10/31/19 6:10 PM, A. Schulze wrote:
>
> editorial note: Appendix B2 and B4 are mostly the same.
>
Mostly, but not exactly. Folks asked us to add B4 because of the new features
in BIND 9.14. Is this still what the WG wants?
--Paul Hoffman
___
DNSOP
Am 31.10.19 um 16:48 schrieb Tim Wicinski:
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis
> If someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak
> out with your reasons.
Hello,
editorial note: Appendix B2 and B4 are mostly the same.
Andreas
__
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Service binding and parameter specification via the
DNS (DNS SVCB and HTTPSSVC)
Authors : Ben
Top-reply to highlight a question:
I think there may be a different rationale for using some of the novel
ideas that Ben and Neil have raised, and am wondering if putting those in a
different draft makes sense?
I think so, and am very interested in working on those. The current draft
can be useful
This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis
Current versions of the draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis/
The Current Intended Status of this document is: Information
Also, Barry Leiba will act as Responsible AD on this documen
This starts a Working Group Last Call for
draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec
Current versions of the draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec/
The Current Intended Status of this document is: Informational
FYI, I will not shepherd this
Thank you, and thanks to Alissa, both for the DISCUSS contents, and
clearing it so quickly.
W
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 5:30 AM Matthijs Mekking wrote:
> Done.
>
> Matthijs
>
> On 10/30/19 5:52 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> > Hi there authors,
> > Do you think that you can get a new version posted b
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-02: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Done.
Matthijs
On 10/30/19 5:52 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> Hi there authors,
> Do you think that you can get a new version posted by tomorrow morning
> addressing these points?
> W
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:00 PM Alissa Cooper via Datatracker
> wrote:
>>
>> Alissa Cooper has entered the fo
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic
Status
Authors : Matthijs Mekking
10 matches
Mail list logo