Done. Matthijs
On 10/30/19 5:52 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > Hi there authors, > Do you think that you can get a new version posted by tomorrow morning > addressing these points? > W > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:00 PM Alissa Cooper via Datatracker > <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-01: Discuss >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCUSS: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> This document needs to incorporate the boilerplate about normative keywords >> from RFC 8174 as well as references to RFC 8174 and RFC 2119. >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> A couple of suggestions since this is being written for posterity as a >> consensus document of the IETF: >> >> s/not every validator actually implements DLV/not every validator actually >> implemented DLV/ >> >> s/The authors are not aware of any such use of DLV./There are no known uses >> of >> DLV for this./ >> >> > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
