On 6 Dec 2016, at 13:08, Paul Hoffman wrote:
In section 3.1, is there a reason the requirement in paragraph 2 does
not
get a 2119 keywords, when the requirement in the first paragraph
does?
They seem similar in impact.
The paragraph is:
If a priming query does not get a response, the rec
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> Why not also when cookies are used? Like TCP, they protect against
> reflection attacks.
My reason for deploying minimal-any was not for direct reflection
attacks, because RRL already deals with direct reflection attacks.
I wanted to avoid sending truncated UDP res
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 09:10:02AM +0100,
Matthijs Mekking wrote
a message of 196 lines which said:
> > This is operational choice, if we call that out do we also call
> > out that answer may depend on address, TSIG etc ?
>
> No, just TCP :)
Why not also when cookies are used? Like TCP, they
