On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
> On 9 Jun 2015, at 8:58, The IESG wrote:
>
>> The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
>> (dnsop) to consider the following document:
>> - 'Definition and Use of DNSSEC Negative Trust Anchors'
>> as Informational
Hi Ed,
On 9 Jun 2015, at 7:49, Edward Lewis wrote:
> On 6/9/15, 6:51, "John Levine" wrote:
>
>>> In a side conversation about "preventing" badness it was suggested to
>>> turn
>>> the conversation towards "accommodating correct behavior." What would it
>>> take for someone to pick an identifier
On 9 Jun 2015, at 8:58, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
> (dnsop) to consider the following document:
> - 'Definition and Use of DNSSEC Negative Trust Anchors'
> as Informational RFC
I have read this document. The topic under discussion
On Jun 8, 2015, at 10:27 PM, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote:
> draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse
My apologies for forgetting about your draft. We will mention it as an
alternative approach in the introduction to draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback and
include an informational reference to it.
--Pau
The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
(dnsop) to consider the following document:
- 'Definition and Use of DNSSEC Negative Trust Anchors'
as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action
On 6/9/15, 6:51, "John Levine" wrote:
>>In a side conversation about "preventing" badness it was suggested to
>>turn
>>the conversation towards "accommodating correct behavior." What would it
>>take for someone to pick an identifier space and get it acknowledged?
>
>Write the software and get pe
>In a side conversation about "preventing" badness it was suggested to turn
>the conversation towards "accommodating correct behavior." What would it
>take for someone to pick an identifier space and get it acknowledged?
Write the software and get people to use it. Once again, this is
homesteadi
On 6/5/15, 21:16, "Warren Kumari" wrote:
>I think that such a list / resource would be a fine idea, but I think
>that:
>A: it would be good to avoid calling it a "registry" (that term has
>specific meaning within the DNS world), and
Not just in the DNS world.
To research this response, I looked
