tl;dr: Ship it.
On adoption: I agree that we should adopt this document.
On WGLC: I have reviewed this document, and I think it's generally in fine
shape to send to the IESG. I have included a few comments below, but
they're mostly editorial. The only issue of any substance is that I would
pref
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:20 PM, John R Levine wrote:
> It would be a shame for them to nitpick the rules because "special purpose
>> namespace" != "TLD"?
>>
>
> Is the CAB really likely to waste its time on that? I don't know them, I
> have no idea. I'd hope they had better things to worry abo
