On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:20 PM, John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> It would be a shame for them to nitpick the rules because "special purpose >> namespace" != "TLD"? >> > > Is the CAB really likely to waste its time on that? I don't know them, I > have no idea. I'd hope they had better things to worry about if it's > abundantly clear whether we've declared .onion to be special. > Speaking with my "CAB Forum member" hat on, I would be happy to make the argument there that they should allow CAs to issue for special purpose names, as long as they follow validation procedures appropriate to each special-purpose namespace. (Though clearly, I can't guarantee an outcome.) The critical thing is having a clear designation, rather than the ambiguity we have now. --Richard > > Regards, > John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
